Sources- Prevention-
Unexpected outcomes
Sources
Individual
Ethics in plain
words means studying and analysing right from wrong, which is identical with
the
objective of
education, telling the young generation what is the right thing to do.
Without
being aware of the distinction between acceptable and accusable/detestable
behaviours,young people become
delinquents(/wrongdoers/lawbreakers|offenders) and criminals, rather than qualified
workers and successful individuals.
It is particularly
true as people are living in a society where violent juvenile crime, teen
pregnancy and suicide are becoming worrying problems. There is thus a strong
call for linking the modification of young people’s behaviour to the teaching
of moral and social values in schools.
In spite of the fact
that urban children are able to receive an excellent education, it does not
automatically mean
that they will grow up without character flaws. In fact, it seems that they are
more
susceptible to bad
habits and social evils. Illegal substances are more common among urban
juveniles
than among rural
adolescents. Uniformity|Sameness and lifelessness|dullness of outdoor environments
is another problem.
Garden settings,
which are believed to have a healing|curative|remedial
power for people living under great pressure, are rare in a metropolitan|urban|municipal area. By
comparison, children living in the country are more likely to access outdoor
play, a recreation activity that can improve moods and prevent feelings o f
isolation.
Ethical principles
and moral values have relevance to the order of a society and individual
citizens' quality of life. The young people who are unaware of standards of
morality will end up with breaching their duties as law-abiding citizens and
ruining the moral values of the society.
Nor can they become
happy, successful and productive. A good example to support this is that many
recent business frauds, bribery, embezzlement and other illegitimate activities
have been found related to some well-educated
but unethical people.
Despite their strong
educational background and high intelligence, they cause damage to enterprises
and communities.
Behaviours
There are a wide
range of factors that account for adolescents' strong aggressive and criminal
tendencies in a modem society, including poverty, repeated exposure to
violence, unstable family life, delinquent peer groups, and so forth.
Family life
The most common
factor responsible for juvenile crime|delinquency
is the loss o f the family life and the increase in family violence. More and
more parents nowadays show an inclination to abuse their
children and treat
them as an outlet of stress. It leaves young children and teenagers a
misleading
impression about
violence and gives them composure when acting violently. Busy lifestyle is
another culprit|cause|reason, reducing
the chance of interaction between parents and children and preventing children
from living and studying in a normal way. A feeling of being neglected can
cause problems like learning disorders|confusions,
a state in which a young person lacks motivation to organise and follow
learning plans.
Despite the strong
proof thal nature is responsible for|results
in|leads to one's behaviour, it is not to deny the function of the
environment people are raised in.
Studies show that
many young criminals come from problem
families|dysfunctional families, who have a history of violence and
crime.
Without good job
prospects, they end up with finding
solace|comfort|consolation in gangs.
The circle of
poverty and crime will continue, as these young criminals start new families|have children with the
characteristics of their own.
Violence
Exposure to violence
is another factor that plays a big role in the increase o f juvenile
delinquency.
Many studies have
made it clear that the upsurge in televised violence and the video games that
have
violence
as the main theme|subject|topic is closely linked to young adults' aggressive
behaviour. This effect has been compounded by the spread o f the Internet,which
tends to negatively impact young people of all ages, of both genders at all
economic levels and all levels o f intelligence.
Prevention
There are some other
determining factors, but it is believed that family life and media are the most
influential. In
combating juvenile delinquency, one should focus on the following elements.
First, an
underage person
should be correctly oriented|directed in
life and their negative experience should be minimised. Whenever a behaviour
problem arises, children should be given correct and immediate instruction.
Meanwhile, it is imperative that parents limit or even prevent children's
exposure to violence, a trigger for their aggressive behaviours.
Education is of
critical importance to
rehabilitating|restoring|mending|reshaping|remoulding an offender|lawbreaker|delinquent attitudes toward
society and family, a prerequisite to their reintegration into the community
meanwhile allows them to keep in contact with the community, an opportunity
that prisoners are normally deprived of. With the passing of time, they lose
confidence and the ability to function prosocially. The risk of re-offending is
thus higher. The third benefit is preventing offenders’ peer group effect,
because by receiving education in a proper learning environment, offenders have
lower chance of reinforcing each other’s antisocial and criminal behaviours in
group situations.
>> skills in
coping with everyday problems
Similar to
education, work is one of the most important interventions in corrections,
whether it takes the form of work release or vocational training. Money is the
main inducement|incentive|enticement of
many crimes, such as shoplifting, robbery, burglary, and so forth. Job training
enables offenders to acquire earning capacity and improve job skills. By this
they can become productive members of society and have the opportunity to
behave normally towards family or occupation or society. Greater post-release
employment success will, in general, lead to a lower rate of recidivism.
>> assist them
in finding jobs
However, to those
habitual criminals, who have committed crimes repeatedly and show little
respect for the legal system, education and job training might not make any
significant difference. This category of offenders gives little thought to
their past or future. Their behaviours and thoughts are deeply ingrained|deep-rooted and unbending|fixed, in which circumstance
imprisonment is the best way of keeping them from being perpetrators|criminals. Meanwhile, imprisonment has deterrent
effects and can deter potential offenders from becoming actual offenders.
>> deterrent
effects
The first point to
support this is that the government can increase intervention, including
launching anti-crime public campaigns, enforcing new laws, and providing
education. A civilised society is characterised|typified
by a high literacy rate and a low crime rate. The negative relationship between
these two parameters implies that one will be away from a life of crime if
given the access to education. Another method relies on the combination|mixture
of imposing tougher|stricter|more rigid
laws and training a more effective police force. Not only does it penalise
those offenders but it also deters prospective criminals. Moreover, the
government can capitalise on the mass media throughout the country to alert the
public to the threat of crime and teach citizens self-defence techniques.
>>governmental
intervention
Besides|Apart from education, other endeavours,
such as improving road infrastructure and transportation systems, are equally
important. Road conditions should be improved to allow different users,
including drivers, cyclists and pedestrians, to use roads safely. Other facilities,
such as stoplights and stop signs, can be used wherever appropriate to curb
speed driving. Furthermore, authorities can sponsor the research for road
safety measures and effective precautions, such as identifying risk factors of
different driving patterns. By translating these findings into policies and
practices, the government is in a stronger position to protect vehicle
occupants and vulnerable road users.
>> provide
efficient and affordable public transport services
Wider intervention
of local authories is also recommended, such as increasing patrols in those
areas where accident rate is high. Road regulations should be reassessed and
revised regularly so as to combat road offences more effectively. When the
existing policies fail to regulate road users’ behaviour, tightening|increasing the control is preferred.
However, as suggested before, strict standards require full compliance. Without
regulations closely observed, standards are in fact vain|ineffective|worthless
>> enforce
compliance with rules and regulations such as wearing motorcycle helmets and
drink-driving penalties
For individual
citizens, many crimes can be nipped in the bud, if they keep vigilant|watchful|wary|cautious at crimes and
are brave enough to fight back. It is particularly true in cases where burglars
break into houses without an alarm system, and shoplifters target those shops
that are not under the surveillance of security' camera. In simple terms, it is
people’s negligence that causes them to fall prey to the criminals. On other
occasions, criminals are pampered|spoiled
by people's cowardice. If they possessed courage to chase criminals or at least
report to the police on a crime, there would be fewer victims
>>
individuals' directed patrol
In many cases, many
automobile accidents occur not because drivers belittle or defy road
regulations but because those regulations are unfamiliar to them. It is an
everyday occurence that rule-breaking acts and traffic crashes are linked to
poor driving skills. Many drivers have limited experience in coping with
different situations and an inaccurate estimation of the complexity of road
conditions, despite having passed licence tests. It alerts people to the loopholes|mistakes in policies, such as the
loose control over car use, low requirements on driving training and low
licence standards. In tackling those problems, it is imperative to require
licence applicants to attend more safe-driving courses and pass
strict tests.
>> boost the
sense of road safe
Crime reduction and
crime prevention also rely on other approaches rather than on security
measures. Criminals choose their targets based on time and whereabouts.
Citizens will be less vulnerable to victimisation if they bypass those places
where crimes frequently occur. There is no need for carrying chemical agents
for self-defense. Many mansions are armed with expensive in-door survaillence
systems, but issuing passes to occupants and tenants and preventing easy access
to the building is more effective and economical, in the inner city, where
crimes are epidemic, eliminating the dilapidated buildings used by criminals
for hiding or selecting a target is more useful than requiring all shops and
residents nearby to install expensive security system. The central part of
crime prevention is altering the environment, by which the root causes or at
least the facilitators of crime can be eliminated.
Arming police is
therefore not advisable in most cases but only allowed in exceptional
circumstances. For example, in those areas where armed crimes are rampant,
armed police protect not only the public but also themselves from the potential
attack. It gives the police the leverage in their combat against criminals,
especially those hardened criminals. Firearms also serve as a deterrent|warning to would-be|possible |potential|prospective offenders. If street
patrols in some neighbourhoods are routinely armed, it helps cut the rates of
crime.
>> benefits of
arming police
Unexpected outcomes
The police: Mistaken
shootings of innocent civilians
The primary concern
on armed police is that it would increase the potential for miscarriages of
justice and mistaken|incorrect shootings
of innocent civilians. The legislation in many countries is supportive of this
concern. Laws protect citizens from torture or cruel treatment and also their
rights on arrest or detainment. If armed, the police will be less likely to
think twice before pulling the trigger. They can easily get away with private execution|the death sentence|capital
punishment by inventing a legitimate excuse, such as self-defense. The
chance of a shoot-out would naturally rise, causing many preventable|unavoidable|unnecessary injuries or
losses of life.
>> protect a
person who is becoming innocent targets
The gun culture
Arming the police
might also add fuel to|encourage|fuel the
gun culture. Nowadays, perhaps nothing is worse than the continued rise in the
gun ownership rate. Arming the police can never
redress|restore|remedy the imbalance but worse, give criminals a motivator|incentive|impetus to carry guns even
for minor crimes. On the other hand, in those communities that are otherwise
peaceful, armed police are intimidating|daunting
and the fear of crime will spread wildly. It would lead to further demand on
private gun ownership, and expose members of the public to higher risk.
>> police weapons add fuel to the gun culture
Fuels the fear of crime
To a larger or
lesser extent, the increased|inflated
presence of anti-crime devices fuels the fear of crime and has a devastating|destructive|harmful effect on
people’s quality of life. Crimes are concentrated in particular areas, but the
fear of crime spreads across the whole community and affects nearly every
resident. The most annoying aspect of this trend is that people’s freedom is curtailed|limited|restricted|restrained|curbed
(for example, using the stairway of a building less frequently due to the alarm
installed there) and sometimes, people’s privacy is invaded (due to the
concealed surveillance cameras in offices). There is little, if any, evidence
that the threat people perceive has a real life counterpart.
>> fail to reduce crime, but displace it to
other areas
On the other hand,
although some measures are said to deter or stop crime, they too often produce
opposite outcomes For example, lighting in a dark area may reduce fear but also
enable criminals to sec their targets more easily, leading to a high probability
of attacks. The benefits of self-protective|self-defensive
measures such as gun ownership and martial arts training are doubtful because
nobody can say with certainty that the
net effect is to decrease harm. Most personal defensive devices are either too
difficult to use or less effective than expected.
>> achieve
unexpected outcomes
No comments:
Post a Comment